Welcome to the new segment I’m starting called Reb00t 1t, where I’ll be discussing the successes and failings of franchise reboots, largely on their own merits but I’ll make comparisons to the original if I feel they’re needed.
Men in Black: International comes under the reboot/sequel
category. Where this is technically a sequel but since none of the main cast
return in major roles and it’s been a few years since the last sequel came out so
I’ll classify it under reboot.
This film has issues in production from the start, Producer
Walter F Parkes and director F. Gary Gray clashes on the direction of the film.
Parkes oversaw extensive rewrites to the original script, with apparently it
being so confusing to stars Chris Hemsworth and Tessa Thompson that they hired
their own dialogue writers.
It also seems he got involved with directing, annoying F.
Gary Gray so much that he actually tried to leave production on multiple
occasions. To be fair, Walter F Parkes was a producer of the original trilogy
so I understand why his experience was considered valuable by Sony.
Made on $94m budget, the film made $265m at the box office,
when you factor in a nearly $200m marketing campaign that went alongside this
film, that’s a substantial loss for the studio. And despite most people’s views
being ambivalent, it also holds the worst critical score on Rotten Tomatoes,
with only 23% of critics giving it a positive score.
We open with a little backstory for each of our two agents. First off Agent H (Chris Hemsworth) and his partner, at this point I presume Agent T (Liam Neeson) fighting off against a threat at a hub at the Eiffel Tower. We don’t see the full story of how that pans out but people believe that they were victorious.
Agent M, as we later know her as a kid sees 2 agents looking
for a rogue alien and failing miserably at their jobs, not looking in the house
for the alien that was in the house and not neuralising the kid M. She spends
years trying to get into the agency and marked as delusional by the
intelligence agencies she applies for.
An opportunity finally arises when she manages to hack into
government satellites to track alien activity, a skill she never actually uses
when she does get into MIB, to get into MIB, and is eventually successful.
She’s sent to London as a probationary agent where she meets with Agent H (quick
question, there are definitely more than 26 agents, what happens when you run
out of letters?) and now Head of the London Branch, High T (get it? That’s the
level of joke you can expect in this film)
H has become… I’m not really sure how to describe he’s lazy,
competent but also incompetent and is failing missions, only surviving in the
agency because of High T. M lies about knowing an alien language (despite
scoring competently in tests about alien languages) to tag along with H on his
latest mission, which goes drastically wrong and sends them on a tour of Europe
and Northern Africa.
This movie is… I won’t say not good because that would be a
lie but it’s not great either. The plots of MIB have always been kinda dumb.
This one is also compounded by the fact that despite the international premise,
it’s also kinda dull. The stakes feel lower than in previous movies, and that
starts with the villains.
Our twin villains, who also had the misfortune of being in
Cats that year, guys, get a better agent are incredibly dull. They have no
personality and their powers are relatively vague and unspecific. As for the
Hive, the main villain, aside from the finale, they’re a vague threat off in
the distance and to be honest, they don’t do enough to Earth to make them menacing.
For example, beyond getting the mcguffin for the movie, what
was their possessed agent doing on Earth. (I can’t not spoil this, High T is
the mole) that’s all he was doing for 10 years, what a waste of time.
The Classic MIB dynamic is the young and energetic but also
naïve and inexperienced agent meets the less in their prime but tough and smart
seasoned agent who can provide the necessary exposition. Moving onto a new pair
could have offered a new dynamic but honestly, I’m not really sure what the dynamic
is between M and H.
Their characters are rather inconsistent with both being
incredibly competent and incredibly incompetent as the script demands it. Chris
Hemsworth and Tessa Thompson have decent chemistry, largely off the back of
other projects they’ve done together. But the inconsistent character writing,
which may be down to the dialogue writers.
Side characters, Agent C is the agent with the stick up his
ass. And then there’s Pawny, the only side-alien in this film, it feels, that’s
not horny as f*ck. His dialogue occasionally makes me smile but there’s nothing
quite funny enough to make me laugh out loud.
Men In Black: International isn’t funny enough to work as a
comedy, nor is it interesting enough to work as a drama, I hear there were supposed
to be parables to immigration, but got cut out over the rewrites. That’s a
shame but I also do understand why that may have made people nervous.
R E B 4 5 T
No comments:
Post a Comment